White House Says: Unlocking Cell Phones Should Be Legal

Should it be legal to unlock your cell phone?  It was up until earlier this year.  However, due to a ruling by the Library of Congress that was based on a new interpretation of the DMCA it is now against the law to unlock your legally bought subsidized cell phone. 

Last month, a petition that was started on the White House's web site received more than 100,000 e-signatures to request that that ruling be changed.  Today, the White House responded and stated that unlocking cell phones should be legal.

Once a consumer has fulfilled his contractual obligations to a service provider for a subsidized cell phone why shouldn't he be able to utilize his cell phone on another carrier?  When someone buys a new car and is finished paying off any outstanding loans on it he is able to generally sell or utilize the vehicle in any manner that suits his purpose.  This includes updating the car's engines and internal mechanics. Therefore, why shouldn't cell phone owners have the same rights?

While the White House and the FCC's acknowledgement that this is a matter that may need a legislative resolution is good news; changing the law will take more than a couple of announcements and/or blog posts.   

To learn more about these issues you may contact me at http://shearlaw.com/attorney_profile.

Copyright 2013 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

ALM's Social Media Risks and Rewards Conference in San Francisco

ALM is hosting a conference focused on the legal risks inherent with Social Media. The conference will be held on April 12, 2011 at the Marines' Memorial Club & Hotel in San Francisco, CA. I have attended several of ALM's Social Media conferences and each time they have covered very timely topics and have had outstanding faculty.

Some of the topics that will be covered next week include: user generated content, brand protection, ethical issues, and privacy issues that social media users and content providers confront. To learn more about the conference here is the link.

[Full Disclosure-Shear on Social Media Law is part of ALM's Law.com Blog Network]

Copyright 2011 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Update On Maryland's Division of Corrections Demands Applicants Provide Facebook Usernames and Passwords During Interviews

Maryland's Division of Corrections (DOC) has suspended its policy that requested applicants "voluntarily" provide their Facebook user name and password as part of a background check. According to the Washington Post, the policy was approximately a year old.

For the overwhelming majority of jobs in the public and private sector employers should not request/demand an applicant's and/or employee's social media user names and/or passwords. Therefore, I would generally advise against management and/or a union asking their employees and/or applicants and/or members to provide their personal social media account user names and/or passwords.

To learn more about the legal ramifications of social media policies you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2011 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Social Media Law Predictions For 2011

Reading the tea leaves and advising clients is what lawyers are paid to do. 2010 was the coming out party for social media and social media law. With the release of the movie "The Social Network" and Facebook surpassing Google in several different web traffic metrics, social media and the practice of social media law has finally come of age. In no particular order, below are some of my social media law predictions for 2011:
1. Employers will continue to grapple with where to draw the line regarding employee social media use.
2. More courts will address social media usage in their instructions to juries and there will be more e-discovery related social media matters.
3. The judicial system, bar associations, and bar counsels will work to find a common sense approach regarding how lawyers, judges, and clients may or may not interact with other other on social media.
4. Intellectual property law will be updated to better protect copyright owners.
5. The Federal Election Commission and state election boards will update their rules to address social media usage by political candidates.
6. Regulated industries such as banking and finance, pharma, etc...will continue refining their approach to regulating social media usage.
7. Federal and state governments will determine what official government social media records need to be retained.
8. Homeland Security, the CIA, FBI, NSA, U.S. Armed Forces, etc... will need re-evaluate their social media policies and determine what they allow their employees to post online.
9. Cyberbulling, Privacy, Defamation, and First Amendment issues will become further intertwined and a rational legal framework will need to be created to address these matters.
10. Social Media Credential Fraud will continue to increase as more people will try to create the perception that they are experts in their professional field due to their social media activity.

To learn more about my social media law predictions you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2011 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

How To Choose A Social Media Lawyer

Choosing a social media lawyer is difficult because there are so few bona fida social media attorneys around. You should choose a social media lawyer in the same manner that you choose a lawyer for any other matter: via due diligence. Social Media Law is like entertainment law and sports law in that there are several different areas of the law that a practitioner should understand.

Some of the areas of the law that a social media lawyer should be knowledgeable about include: Internet law, intellectual property, employment law, business law, media law, and privacy law. A social media lawyer should also know how social media may be used in other legal specialties and the business of social media. In addition, a social media lawyer must understand social media technology and how social media is utilized. A social media lawyer must not just talk the talk, he must walk the walk.

I have noticed some lawyers falsely advertising they have social media experience and some who have even fraudulently created social media credentials. Due diligence via a Google search, a review of an attorney's social media usage, and personal recommendations should enable a client to determine a lawyer's true social media knowledge. Having a blog, a Twitter account, or a Facebook or Myspace page for your practice does not mean you are a social media lawyer. It just means that you spend your spare time creating content that you want the entire world to see.

To learn more about my social media credentials I welcome you to do a Google search and review my lawyer profile. If you are in need of social media lawyer you may contact me at http://www.shearlaw.com/.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Does Google agree with my 1 day DMCA safe harbor definition of expeditiously?

According to the Associated Press, Google has stated that it will respond to complaints about pirated material within 24 hours after receiving notification. This announcement also states that Google will better police the sites that utilize its ad network to try to limit copyright violations. This long overdue announcement is great news for content creators.

On June 30, 2010, I stated that even though Viacom lost the initial round of the Viacom v. YouTube case, the case may be a win for copyright holders in the long run. I made my prediction because if YouTube was able to remove more than 100,000 infringing copyrighted clips within 1 business day of being notified more than three years ago, there is no reason why commercial entities shouldn't be held to this standard today.

Google's new 24 hour policy is welcome news because content creators have lost billions of dollars to intentional copyright infringement over the past ten years. Google also needs to enact this policy for trademark infringement. I am waiting for Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, etc... to agree to the same policy for not just copyright infringement but also for trademark infringement. Only after these companies actively enforce a 24 hour turnaround for intellectual property infringement may they claim they are actively protecting content creators.

I challenge Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and every other social media company to follow Google's lead in protecting intellectual property.

To learn how to protect and monetize your intellectual property you may contact me at http://www.shearlaw.com/.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Did a Social Media "October Surprise" Derail the U.S. 2022 World Cup Bid?

There will be a tremendous amount of soul searching in the coming weeks from the U.S. soccer community regarding its failed 2022 World Cup bid. U.S. bid chairman Sunil Gulati did everything legally possible to bring the World Cup competition back to the United States. Gulati traveled all over the world and enlisted President Clinton and Oscar winner Morgan Freeman for the final presentation. Unfortunately, that was not enough. Qatar was awarded the 2022 World Cup.

After FIFA announced who would host the 2022 World Cup Gulati stated, "Can I sit here today and say these are the seven things that we would do different? No..I think we did everything we could." President Obama weighed in and stated it was the "wrong decision." As a U.S. soccer fan, I am disappointed about the outcome. However, I am not surprised.

According to ESPN, the U.S. bid "far exceeded its rivals in the areas of ticketing, media rights, licensing, hospitality and sponsorship." Having the best bid or pitch does not guarantee success. Even though there have been accusations that graft may have occurred during the bid process, the bottom line is that the U.S. will not be hosting the 2022 World Cup.

In my opinion, the latest WikiLeaks document release may have swayed the voters. In other words, Social Media may have been the cause of the U.S. not being the host of the 2022 World Cup. Some of my colleagues may think I am off my rocker and that I sound like a modern day Fox Mulder right out of the X-Files. However, during the past several days the WikiLeaks U.S. cable document release has dominated international news. This story has been on the cover of every major news publication all over the world. You had to be living in a cave without a modern day electronic device not to hear about it.

WikiLeaks is a website that relies on user generated content. According to its website it is, "a non-profit media organization dedicated to bringing important news and information to the public." On November 28, 2010, WikiLeaks made available on its website more than 250,000 secret U.S. diplomatic cables. The fact that WikiLeaks was able to obtain these secret cables in the first place demonstrates that the U.S. has a serious problem with data security that I am hoping will be resolved in the near future. However, the content inside some of the cables provides the impression that some of the U.S. State Department employees are using diplomatic cover to spy. This allegation along with many other embarrassing revelations such as how U.S. diplomats view some world leaders was not helpful to the U.S. World Cup bid.

If I was a World Cup voter from another country I may have been angry at the U.S. and may have have taken my anger out against it by voting for Qatar. I may have asked myself, "if the World Cup is held in the U.S. will my fellow countrymen and diplomats have to worry about being spied on during the competition?

It appears that WikiLeaks has been in possession of these documents for some time. Therefore, why were these documents released just a few days before the World Cup vote? Was this release an "October Surprise" that was done with the precision akin to a smart bomb? Is WikiLeaks part of a modern day SPECTRE (Special Executive for Counter Intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion) that wreaked havoc on the world in the James Bond books and movies? The latest WikiLeaks document release is extremely politically damaging and it appears that it was intentionally timed to inflict maximum political and economic damage on the United States. Why else were the documents released over Thanksgiving weekend just before the World Cup vote?

To learn more about these issues you may contact me at http://www.shearlaw.com/.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved

Supreme Court Issues Groundbreaking Social Media Law Case

The U.S. Supreme Court earlier today issued a unanimous ruling in the City of Ontario, California et al v. Quon government workplace privacy sexting case. The Court ruled that a public employer's review of text messages on a publicly owned electronic device was a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment and that the Ninth Circuit erred by concluding otherwise. The Court focused on the Fourth Amendment search issue and side stepped the broader expectation of privacy issue.

On December 14, 2009, I blogged about this case and I opined that the Supreme Court should reverse the 9th Circuit's ruling and find for the City of Ontario because an employer needs to be able to review all electronic communications that are sent via an employer owned account. My opinion was based on the premise that while using employer owned devices employees either know or should know that their employer may need to review the messages that have been sent via the electronic device for a work-related purpose.

Here, the Petitioner, City of Ontario, had purchased pagers for Respondent, Quon and others who were employed by the City. Only after Quon and other public employees had exceeded the character limits that the City had purchased on their behalf for several months did the City inquire why this was occurring. Upon reviewing the transcripts of the messages that Quon was sending, the City realized that a large percentage of the sent messages were personal and not work related. Quon was disciplined for misusing his City owned electronic device so he filed a suit against the City. The City of Ontario had a policy on computer, Internet, and e-mail use that clearly stated that the city had the right to monitor such communications. The policy allowed “light personal communications” but said “users should have no expectation of privacy or confidentiality.” Sergeant Quon signed a statement agreeing to the City's policy.

The Quon decision should be a wake up call to government employees. In the public sector, electronic communications sent through employer owned electronic accounts may not be subject to the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches, as long as employers have “a legitimate work-related purpose” for inspecting the communications. Both public and private employers need to have policies in place that outline the usage policy of employer owned devices and accounts because the line is blurring between personal and business use of electronic devices and accounts. I predict that the Supreme Court will be hearing more cases in the near future regarding similar issues and that the court will need to understand the specific nuances of social media and the electronic devices utilized to access these new technologies and platforms.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC.  All rights reserved.

Will the White House's Use of Social Media Eventually Diminish Access to the President?

Social Media is here to stay. In fact it may become the dominant form of communication in the near future. The legal, political, and societal ramifications are tremendous. President Obama utilized social media to get elected and his administration is using social media to actively engage with the American people and the rest of the world. For example, the White House has an official Twitter account and is currently looking for a Twitterer-In-Chief. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs recently stated that Twitter is an amazing tool.

The White House has about 1.75 million followers and follows just 99 other accounts. However, if you look closely at who the White House follows you will see that it mainly follows other U.S. government entities. It also follows 10 Downing Street, aka the British Prime Minister's office. Why doesn't the White House follow more governments, both friend and alleged foe? Is the White House intentionally keeping the number of accounts it follows in double digits?

The White House also has an official blog. Will the official White House Blog soon replace press releases since a blog is a de facto press release mechanism. I am wondering if the President's weekly radio address and daily press briefings will soon be replaced by the pre-recorded podcast. From the White House's own website you can watch official presidential events via audio or video podcast.

In the future, a majority of the population may rely solely on social media as their news gathering resource. During a major political crisis will the White House turn mainly to social media to get its message out and stop the daily press briefing? Will the current or a future President decide to stop the traditional daily briefings and instruct the White House Press Secretary to utilize daily interactive webinars? Will the White House limit the media's access for political purposes?  The First Amendment and freedom of the press issues that are intertwined with social media and politics are mind boggling. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Oprah's and Dove Soap's Internet Monetization and Branding Strategy

Oprah is one of the smartest entrepreneurs in the world and has one of the most recognizable brands and her team works hard to protect and grow her brand. As a Baltimore native, I would like to think that it was the water that Oprah imbibed during her long stint working in Baltimore that prepared her for success. Right after she left Baltimore for Chicago she became a world wide superstar. Some other former Baltimoreans who became successful after leaving Baltimore include: Babe Ruth, Barry Levinson, John Waters, and Nancy Pelosi so I hope my water theory is true because it gives hope to all former Baltimoreans (myself included).

My two year old son is very musically inclined and enjoys watching and singing and dancing to various music videos that we watch together on Youtube. A couple of weeks ago, my wife started watching with our son a clip from a recent Oprah show that included the cast from Glee singing Journey's "Don't Stop Believin". For about a week they went to Youtube to watch the clip.

All of sudden the clip they were watching disappeared and a message appeared stating that the clip was removed due to copyright infringement. My wife then went to Oprah.com and found the clip. However, on Oprah.com, there was a 30 second Dove commercial that had to be watched before the cast of Glee's rendition of Don't Stop Believin was played. The web page that contained the Glee clip was fully branded by Dove. In addition, Dove was a sponsor of the actual episode that aired the performance on The Oprah Winfrey Show and is a sponsor on Fox.com's Glee home page.

Even though it appears that Oprah and Dove fully branded the entire user experience they both missed out on creating a Social Media 360 Deal. This was an internet brand campaign and not a social media brand campaign. To learn how to fully monetize your social media assets you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Protecting Your Social Media Profile

The 2008 election cycle was the first social media election. President Obama is the first U.S. President to successfully harness the power of social media to get elected. According to a post on Read Write Web from November 2008, President Obama had a major social media advantage over Senator McCain. For example, a few days before the November 2008 election Obama had 844,927 MySpace friends while Mcain had only 219,404. This major disparity was a harbinger of the future.

Even though President Obama successfully utilized social media to become President of the United States, he is not the first social media President. The first social media President will be the first elected President who has years of tweets, Facebook posts, blog entries, podcasts, etc... that will need to be reviewed by campaign managers, public relation firms, lawyers, political strategists, etc...The legal and political ramifications are mind boggling.

As of this writing, the confirmation process of Professor Goodwin Liu, a nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is in motion and questions have been raised as to why Prof. Liu did not turn over all of the documents that the Senate Judiciary Committee initially requested. As far as I know, Professor Liu does not have years of tweets, Facebook posts, blog entries, podcasts, etc...to review. However, what if he does? How would this affect his nomination?

Earlier this week, the Library of Congress announced that all public tweets will be saved for posterity. First, Google decided to archive all tweets. Now the Library of Congress will be saving all your tweets for posterity. Therefore, it is more important than ever to protect your social media profile. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Entertainment Social Media Branding Contracts

Branding products and services and how the law protects your brand is extremely important in the social media age. Recording artists, writers, and film makers are utilizing social media to create their brand and to include other brands in their work to attract the attention of corporate sponsors.

Recently, a New York Times article discussed how some entertainment contracts include specific branding clauses and that some talent feel pressured to include certain brands in their work to attract sponsors. Television product placement is not new. During most live television programs the announcers usually state throughout the program that the show or event is sponsored by xyz company. One of the most famous movie product placements was Reese's Pieces in the movie E.T. in 1982. When I watched the movie as a child I had no idea that this was a product placement. However, as an adult I would expect that most adults who watch the movie know or should know that including Reese's Pieces prominently in the movie was a big advertising coup for Hershey.

Under the recently revised FTC Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising "material connections" between advertisers and endorsers must be disclosed. However, I am wondering when is this threshold actually met? For example, if an artist includes a brand in his work in the hopes that the brand will end up sponsoring his work, and then the brand eventually sponsors the artist's work does this connection need to be disclosed since the original work was not created with a "material connection" between the artist and the brand? If an artist posts his original work on Youtube or another social media website before there is a "material connection" but later a corporate sponsor is attracted to the project does the artist now need to disclose this sponsorship?

These are some of the many legal issues that the social media age has created. Constantly changing technology will only make these issues more difficult to analyze. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at http://www.shearlaw.com/.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

A Catch-22 in the Social Media Age

Earlier this week a prominent client of mine asked me what I can do to stop a local blogger from constantly writing about my client’s personal activities and linking to my client’s company’s website. I explained the available options and discussed with him why it may be best to ignore the blogger. I mentioned the Jones Day v. Blockshopper.com case that was settled last year where a large law firm, Jones Day, filed suit against an internet company that listed the real estate purchases of some of the law firm’s employees and then linked to the employee’s law firm biographies. This case was settled out of court and the bottom line is that Blockshopper.com is still able to link public land records to the web biographies of Jones Day employees.

I told my client something I’m sure many are taught in elementary school, to ignore the bully, and eventually, the bully will go away. My client was told not to do what Jerry Seinfeld did to Kathy Griffin’s character Sally Weaver in the January 1998 Seinfeld episode “The Cartoon.” In the social media age, if a cease and desist letter is sent to a blogger, assuming the blogger can be identified, it will just provide the blogger more ammunition and will most likely increase traffic to the blog. Most of my clients are Type-A personalities and it goes against their make-up to ignore this type of situation. In general, the 1st Amendment protects most forms of speech. Therefore, in many of these situations it is be best not to legitimize the offending blog’s comments by providing a response. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Social Media and The Right To Publicity

The Right To Publicity enables a person to profit off of his or her name or likeness. This right varies from state to state and may be extremely valuable for entertainers and professional athletes who have a marketable name or likeness. This right was first recognized by the U.S. Courts in 1953 in Halean v. Topps 202 F.2d 866. Here, a baseball card company sued a competitor alleging that it owned an exclusive right to photograph and to publicize ballplayers they had under contract and that a competitor did not have the right to utilize a player's likeness in their trading card set while the player was still under contract with the plaintiff.

The Halean Court stated, "that, in addition to and independent of that right of privacy, a man has a right in the publicity value of his photograph, i. e., the right to grant the exclusive privilege of publishing his picture, and that such a grant may validly be made 'in gross,' i. e., without an accompanying transfer of a business or of anything else. Whether it be labelled a 'property' right is immaterial; for here, as often elsewhere, the tag 'property' simply symbolizes the fact that courts enforce a claim which has pecuniary worth. This right might be called a 'right of publicity.' For it is common knowledge that many prominent persons (especially actors and ball-players), far from having their feelings bruised through public exposure of their likenesses, would feel sorely deprived if they no longer received money for authorizing advertisements, popularizing their countenances, displayed in newspapers, magazines, busses, trains and subways. This right of publicity would usually yield them no money unless it could be made the subject of an exclusive grant which barred any other advertiser from using their pictures."

Entertainers, professional athletes, and celebutantes (those famous for being famous) have a love-hate relationship with the paparazzi. The paparazzi serve a much needed role because they help these people stay in the public's eye. According to the L.A. Times, some celebrities may have formal or informal relationships with members of the paparazzi which feed the publicity machine that is so important to an entertainer's career. Celebrities sell the rights to their images for staggering sums. For example, according to the Today Show, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie sold photos of their newborn twins to People and Hello magazines for $14 million dollars. Pitt and Jolie had previously sold images of their daughter Shiloh to Getty Images for a donation and to People and Hello Magazine for $4 million dollars.

The bottom line is that social media may create new revenue opportunities that if properly utilized has the potential to become major income streams. Unfortunately, for most entertainers and professional athletes the window of opportunity to capitalize on these assets is short and unpredictable. Therefore, social media action plans must be created and implemented during the early stages of a celebrity's or athlete's career. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

How Do You Solve A Problem Like Maria (Juror Facebooking)?

I was invited to speak at the University of Baltimore's Lunch Time Law Series on February 22, 2010 to discuss entertainment and social media law. The Lunch Time Law Series is a great program that invites members of the legal community to discuss current trends in the law.

During the program, the State v. Dixon case was brought up. I previously blogged about this case on December 30,2009, and on January 15, 2010. In this case, five jurors communicated with each other outside of the courtroom via Facebook. The defense team found out about this after a verdict had been entered but before sentencing. Whether this activity constituted juror misconduct enough to warrant Dixon a new trial was never decided because a settlement was reached. Therefore, the Maryland legal community is still trying to figure out how best to avoid this problem in the future.

In my opinion, the temptation to access the Internet and social media sites is too great. Over the past several years, more and more people are ditching their landlines for smartphones, which allow quick and easy access to the Internet. Therefore, the courts have to put rules in place to safeguard the integrity of the jury system.

There are several different ways to do this. The first is to sequester all jurors, which frankly is impractical for many reasons, including, cost, and inconvenience.

The second possible solution would be to require prospective jurors to list all of their social media accounts on the juror questionnaire, including for example, Twitter name and password, and Facebook userid and password. This would enable court staff and the legal parties to not only screen for juror bias, but also to ensure that the impaneled jurors are not discussing the case in violation of court admonishments. In my opinion, this would intrude on a prospective juror’s right to privacy. The U.S. Constitution does not expressly protect one’s right to privacy. However, I believe it is inherent and forcing people to turn over this information may make people more inclined than they already are to try to avoid jury duty.

A third option, and the one that I believe is most viable is to require jurors sign a form stating that they agree not to discuss their case in any medium, including social media while they are impaneled. The form would include possible legal penalties if they disobey the directive.

On September 10, 2009, I blogged about how the San Francisco Court System is handling this issue.The U.S. Federal Courts recently weighed in on this problem and their response was to put forth a new model set of jury instructions: http://www.uscourts.gov/newsroom/2010/DIR10-018.pdf

Suggested jury instructions and admonishments for disobeying the rules are not enough. Real consequences are needed to take away the temptation to surf, post, blog, podcast, etc...There are no easy answers to "solving a problem like Maria (Juror Facebook)." However, a 21st century solution that addresses these issues and anticipates future challenges is needed. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.

Social Media Engagement Product Placement Contracts

Social media rights in professional sports is going to soon become one of the biggest revenue generating streams outside of a professional player's contract. It may take several years for this prediction to pan out but I guarantee that this will occur in the near future.

There are only a handful of professional athletes who are able to obtain major endorsement deals. The traditional form of endorsement deals where an athlete such as Tiger Woods is seen utilizing or standing next to a product is going to significantly change in the near future. Since the Tiger Woods scandal, companies are now going to be extremely careful about putting all of their eggs in one basket no matter how successful an athlete is in their chosen profession. In the Social Media Age an athlete's image can drastically change with one posted youtube video. Since the corporate world is generally risk averse, many companies will soon realize that a new endorsement paradigm will need to be created.

Traditional print, television, and radio advertising is dying a slow death. Internet banner ads and the pay per click model is also in transition. The wave of the future is what I would like to call "Engagement Product Placement." Engagement Product Placement occurs when a paid endorser such as a professional athlete is hired to engage in a conversation with his or her Facebook Fans, Twitter Followers, or other social media connections about a product or service. Chad Ochocinco, a wide receiver for the Cincinnati Bengals, has more than 186,000 Facebook Fans and almost 750,000 Twitter Followers. Given Chad Ochocinco's popularity just imagine the opportunities available.

The companies who hire paid endorsers and the attorneys for paid endorsers must be fully versed in the Federal Trade Commission's new guidelines before negotiating Engagement Product Placement Contracts. Paid endorsers need to hire attorneys who understand the technology and full power of social media to account for the permutations that exist in this type of contract.

In the Social Media Age attorneys need to find creative ways to address all of the business and legal issues that accompany social media usage. To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com

Copyright 2010 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC. All rights reserved.