New Jersey Governor Chris Christie proclaimed that New Jersey employees have an expectation of privacy in the digital age when he signed A2878 into law earlier today. New Jersey has joined the growing number of states that are protecting the personal digital privacy of their employees and students. At least 13 states have enacted similar laws and 36 states along with Congress have introduced bills to protect
NCAA schools, students, employers, employees, etc... from companies that are selling social media monitoring legal liability
time bombs.
Some social media monitoring companies may claim they are a
"leader" in social media monitoring and/or in "educating"
student-athletes. Does the NSA claim they are monitoring personal digital accounts to educate? No. Therefore, any claim by Varsity Monitor, UDiligence, Fieldhouse Media, etc...that they are monitoring to "educate" is absolute *&%%&*$%.
Varsity Monitor, UDiligence, and Fieldhouse Media each sell
social media monitoring services that NCAA schools in at least 13 states may
not utilize to track the personal digital accounts of their
coaches and/or student-athletes. Schools
deploying the social media monitoring services of these companies may be
fined hundreds of thousands of dollars, and/or may be sued for violating
their student's first and/or fourth amendment rights, and/or may lose
millions of dollars in federal funding.
According to Deadspin, Varsity Monitor may have some troubling ethical and legal problems to address. The Courier Journal reported that Varsity Monitor's Centrix Social service was caught last year monitoring University of Kentucky student-athletes for using the terms
"Arab" or "Muslim" online. Why did Sam Carnahan, the owner of Varsity Monitor allow this to occur?
According to Time Magazine,
UDiligence was monetizing the personal photographs of the
student-athletes it was monitoring to advertise its services until it was confronted about this troubling practice. Unfortunately, UDiligence's founder Kevin Long only removed the offending photos from his UDiligence web site but not another one of his company web sites (I have screen shots if he claims otherwise). This demonstrates that schools, student-athletes, and sports related entities should think long and hard before trusting any entity that Mr. Long owns or controls.
The most troubling service may be Fieldhouse Media because it appears to
be trying to differentiate itself as having less invasive tactics than
the other companies. NCAA athletic departments should not be fooled.
It appears that in order for Fieldhouse Media's social media monitoring
service to properly work student-athletes need to at least authenticate their social
media username(s). Arkansas, California, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, New
Jersey, and New Mexico have generally banned schools from being
able to ask a student to verify this information.
Fieldhouse Media's Kevin DeShazo's business practices appear to raise
serious ethical questions. For example, last year Mr. DeShazo created a
press release
announcing his social media monitoring service that quoted me without
my cooperation. Did Mr. DeShazo ask for my permission to be quoted in a
press release designed to sell his social media monitoring services?
No. Why is Mr. DeShazo trying to associate my reputation with a practice
that I along with lawyers and risk professional from around the country
believe may create tremendous legal and financial risks?
If you perform due diligence on Mr. DeShazo you may find some issues
that warrant further explanation. For example, according to his
publicly available LinkedIn Profile
from last year it states that before he started his social media
monitoring firm he had no verifiable social media or NCAA
compliance/advisory experience. Interestingly, according to his recent
publicly available LinkedIn Profile it now claims that prior to starting his social media monitoring
company he was working for a social media marketing firm. If Mr. DeShazo
was actually working for a social media marketing company before he
started his social media consulting firm why wasn't it listed
previously? Why has Mr. DeShazo recently claimed he launched Fieldhouse Media in 2010 (I have screen shots if this is denied) which conflicts with his LinkedIn Profile claims and the information on file with the Oklahoma Secretary of State?
In 2001, George O'Leary, Notre Dame's head football coach
resigned five days after being hired because of "inaccuracies" in his
published biography. In other words, Mr. O'Leary was caught
intentionally misleading NCAA athletic departments about his
background. After George O'Leary, Jayson Blair was caught creating a web of lies and was terminated from the New York Times, and then James Frey, the author of "A Million Little Pieces" was caught lying to Oprah.
Anyone that approaches schools to sell services to track personal social media accounts is
selling a legal liability time bomb. If a school hires a social media monitoring firm to track the
personal digital content of their students or employees and it misses an indication
that there may be a crime committed it may cost the school more than
$100 million dollars. For proof, just review the Penn State emails
regarding the Jerry Sandusky matter. Does a school want to be on the
hook for tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in legal liability
because it was utilizing a social media monitoring service to track personal digital accounts?
Copyright 2013 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC All rights reserved.
To inform about the legal, business, privacy, cyber security, and public policy issues that confront those who utilize digital platforms.
Showing posts with label Student Athletes and Social Media Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Student Athletes and Social Media Education. Show all posts
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Monday, April 8, 2013
Arkansas Bans NCAA Student-Athlete Social Media Monitoring Companies
Arkansas has became the latest state to enact legislation that bans
schools from deploying social media monitoring firms to track their students' personal digital accounts. Arkansas joins Delaware, California, Michigan, New Jersey and Utah in protecting their
schools, students, and taxpayers from fear and misinformation.
Consultants who sell student-athlete social media monitoring services to athletic departments are selling legal liability time bombs. Deadspin has already exposed several companies as having no connection to college athletics before starting their "social media monitoring firms". Some companies that are approaching colleges appear to be making material misrepresentations to market their services.
One consultant quoted me (who appears to have no verifiable experience in college athletics, social media, law, or compliance before he started selling his services to NCAA schools) in a press release touting his social media monitoring service last year. Quoting me to market a service that may create tremendous legal liability for NCAA schools is very troubling. Lawyers and risk professionals who understand this issue would never endorse a service that may increase a school's legal liability and/or may advise an academic institution to violate state and/or federal law.
The bottom line is that states across the country are banning schools from being able to deploy firms to monitor and archive their students' personal digital content. These laws may cumulatively save schools around the United States hundreds of millions of dollars in monitoring, legal, compliance, and insurance costs.
To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.
Copyright 2013 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC All rights reserved.
Consultants who sell student-athlete social media monitoring services to athletic departments are selling legal liability time bombs. Deadspin has already exposed several companies as having no connection to college athletics before starting their "social media monitoring firms". Some companies that are approaching colleges appear to be making material misrepresentations to market their services.
One consultant quoted me (who appears to have no verifiable experience in college athletics, social media, law, or compliance before he started selling his services to NCAA schools) in a press release touting his social media monitoring service last year. Quoting me to market a service that may create tremendous legal liability for NCAA schools is very troubling. Lawyers and risk professionals who understand this issue would never endorse a service that may increase a school's legal liability and/or may advise an academic institution to violate state and/or federal law.
The bottom line is that states across the country are banning schools from being able to deploy firms to monitor and archive their students' personal digital content. These laws may cumulatively save schools around the United States hundreds of millions of dollars in monitoring, legal, compliance, and insurance costs.
To learn more about these issues you may contact me at www.shearlaw.com.
Copyright 2013 by the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC All rights reserved.
Monday, April 1, 2013
University of Maryland Law School's Symposium on Social Media and the Law
On
Friday, April 5, 2013, from 9:00 am to 3:30 pm the University of
Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law's Journal of Business &
Technology Law is sponsoring a symposium titled, "Social Media and the Law: An Exploratory Look into the Legal Effects of Online Interconnectedness." The event is free, open to the general public,
and lunch will be provided to those who RSVP.
Speakers
will present on a range of topics, including: the constitutionality of
student athlete social media policies; the relationship between social
media interfaces and copyright law; and how social media laws are
developing with respect to employment law, contracts, and privacy
matters. Our speakers include private practitioners, a higher education
media relations representative, and professors of law
and communications. To RSVP please visit the Journal's website: http://www.law.umaryland.edu/academics/journals/jbtl/symposia.html .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)